Skip Navigation


Chinese Journal of International Law Advance Access originally published online on May 14, 2009
Chinese Journal of International Law 2009 8(2):285-290; doi:10.1093/chinesejil/jmp008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
8/2/285    most recent
jmp008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Orakhelashvili, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

AGORA: KOSOVO (PART 2)

The Kosovo UDI between Agreed Law and Subjective Perception: A Response to Hilpold

Alexander Orakhelashvili*

Correspondence: * LLM cum laude (Leiden), PhD (Cantab.); Visiting Fellow, British Institute of International and Comparative Law (email: a.orakhelashvili{at}biicl.org). This article was completed on 15 April, 2009.

Just like any other important international controversy, the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Kosovo raises multiple aspects of the relationship between law, fact and politics on the international plane. Diverse outcomes and solutions could be suggested from a theoretical perspective, with different options for balancing the importance of legal, factual and political factors. However, making an international legal argument on the independence claim of Kosovo requires that argument to be based on the verifiable set of qualified evidence pointing to the acceptance of the pertinent position by the international society of States. Over-theorizing the Kosovo question detaches its analysis from the international legal argument.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.